Coach
I am a fan of the Boise State Broncos. This is for two reasons, one which is rather self-serving, and the other which is pseudo-moral. First I cheer for the Broncos because they can throw a gigantic monkey wrench into the fiasco that is the B.C.S. I don’t know anyone who likes the B.C.S., or if they do support it hide like a closet democrat in east Tennessee. The B.C.S. is about nothing but money, and lots of it! The cities in which B.C.S. games are played enjoy massive boosts to their respective economy. I have absolutely no problem with that, but what I do have an issue with is the NCAA (better known as the High and Mighty Dark Overlord of College Athletics) acting as an agent for these communities and sharing in the profits while dictating what is and what’s not acceptable conduct any time money and student athletes are mentioned in the same sentence.
Secondly, I cheer for the Broncos because they’re the underdog, and who among us doesn’t love a good underdog story? These kids have won 17 straight games and haven’t sniffed the “national championship” game. If they were in the PAC-10, SEC, Big-10, or Big 12, there would be monuments erected in their honor. This is a good football team, regardless of conference. (This coming from the biggest SEC honk there is) Boise State would beat any team in the SEC tomorrow, except for Alabama. Chew on that one for a minute!
Mike
Well I do have to agree with the ole Coach on this one. At least one of his thoughts is valid on this topic. He is correct that Boise St. is very fun to watch and that blue field is definitely a treat for these baby greens. I will say that I always hesitate on their channel when I see the Big Blue Machine to see how things are looking for them. However, and this is a VERY BIG however..... Boise St. could possibly beat any ONE team in the SEC today. TODAY folks - I think they could catch them in a one and done, but I implore you to bring them over to the Southeastern Friggin Conference to play government ball with the big boys. (Side note: If you don't know what government ball is - please see Kiffin, Lane or Carroll, Pete to see what they did to their last respective teams. That is government ball.) Point is - they wouldn't be able to play in the big leagues without doing some government work. Taxes are expensive week in and week out on this side of the country and that blue field would be stained red every home game the Buckin' Broncos had a home game. I'm sure the Coach would possibly agree with me on this one, but his pride for the underdog will not allow it. All in all though - I do hope the boys of fall in Boise help throw the BCS out the window with the bath water. Just think there might be a lil too much green being tossed around by the dinosaurs to allow that to happen.
Brock-tober is almost upon us Boiler Room faithful. I can't tell you how happy I was to hear that Mir KO'd Mirko. Just one step closer to getting him back into the ring with my big Viking (or at least the descendant of Vikings doin' work.
Good talks folks - until next time.
Coach
Government ball? Is that at all like government cheese? My dear Shogun, the mighty Boise State Broncos will likely go undefeated this season, barring a MAJOR upset. While the Tide will lose one game somewhere along the line. So the question then becomes, as has already been debated, "Do you take an undefeated Boise State team with a less-than-stellar schedule (which is no fault of their own) or do you take a one-loss Alabama team who's gone through the gauntlet of the SEC?
Make no doubt that the powers that be WANT that one-loss 'Bama team because they have a larger following and will bring more money to the "national championship" game where ever it's held this season. The Broncos will have a good following too, but nothing compared to the rabid 'Bama fans, hungry for a repeat title.
So my premise remains; the national title game is a complete farce and has nothing to do with the two best teams in college football "settling it on the field" but has much more to do with who can bring the larger crowd to a given city and pump revenue into the local economy; plain and simple. If you honestly think the "championship" is truly about the to best teams in football playing, you're just not paying attention.
Mike
Brother, it is EXACTLY like govt cheese!!!! I'm completely fine with Boise St going undefeated for the regular season - except for the fact of strength of schedule. Let me back up one second! I in no way think we have a good system in place right now(read:BCS). But, since we have it we have to understand it's quirks and how things will shake out. I for one (and you make two) applaud Boise St for all they have accomplished to get where they are. I just think that their strength of schedule is where the proverbial monkey wrench comes in. Do I think that the Broncos should be rewarded with a Nat'l champ game just cause they posted a goose egg in the L column? I completely agree that the Nat'l champ game doesn't have a perfect system to give us the best 2 teams but it is what it is!!! Think less about dollars and how it makes cents and more about how you think the Buckin' Broncos would fare against even say UT's strength of schedule. I realize it's a pipe dream to think that all teams should be judged based on how they do and less on current justifiers. As it stands now - teams are so scared to go outside the box when scheduling non-conf games due to the way they're rewarded for going undefeated. Here's a radical idea - build the system like UFC currently runs. Yes - teams will get beat but judge them on who they're beat by and go forward. Then, we'll have a regular season that all these "believers"(read:kool aid drinkers) in the BCS can say is worthy of holding off a playoff system.
Good talks - good time Beef!